Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Measure Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectation in Mathematics Learning
- Announcements
- About the Journal
- Editorial Team
- Peer Reviewers
- Online Submissions
- Focus and Scope
- Author Guidelines
- Publication Ethics
- Peer Review Process
- Open Access Policy
- Plagiarism Policy
- Copyright & License
- Privacy Statement
- Scientific Statement
- Author Fees
- Archiving
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Scopus Citation Analysis
- Journal History
- Contact Person
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze things that can have an influence on self-efficacy and outcome expectations in learning mathematics and to confirm the suitability of the model with the data using First order confirmatory factor analysis (1st Order CFA). The population in this study were students of SMA Plus Al Athiyah Aceh with a large sample of 53 students. The sample was selected based on a purposive sampling technique with the criteria that students with good, medium and low math achievement from each grade level. The research data were analyzed using the Linear Structural Model (LISREL) version 8.8 from Joreskog and Sorbom. The results of data analysis showed that the self-efficacy and outcome expectation instruments had good quality construct validity after eliminating the two items c3 and c5. Item c1 which is the belief in being able to correctly solve all math problems that the teacher gives most dominantly reflects self-efficacy in learning mathematics, while item d2 which feels it is important to learn mathematics most dominantly reflects the aspect of outcome expectation in learning mathematics.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Agustiani, H., Cahyad, S., & Musa, M. (2016). Self-efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Students Academic Performance. The Open Psychology Journal, 9(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101609010001
Ahmad, A., & Safaria, T. (2013). Effects of Self-Efficacy on Students’ Academic Performance. In Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology (Vol. 2, Issue 1).
Al-mehsin, S. A. (2017). Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Social Skills and the Quality of Decision-Making among the Students of Prince Sattam Bin Abdul-Aziz University. International Education Studies, 10(7), 108. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n7p108
Alwisol. (2007). Psikologi kepribadian. UMM Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. In Psychological Review (Vol. 84, Issue 2).
Bandura, A. (1994). Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 4). Academic Press. http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy, The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A., Schunk Bandura, D. H., & Schunk, A. (n.d.). Cultivating Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-Motivation. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 41). http://www.apa.org/
Basith, A., Syahputra, A., & Aris Ichwanto, M. (2020). Academic Self-Efficacy As Predictor Of Academic Achievement. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.24403
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for applied Research (Second). The Guilford Press.
Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Vermue, C., Deinum, J. F., & van Rooij, E. (2021). First-year academic achievement: the role of academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning and beyond classroom engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(7), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1845606
Gibson, James. L., & Donelly. (2000). Organizations Behavior Structure Processes (Tenth). McGraw-Hill.
Girli, A., & Öztürk, H. (2017). Metacognitive reading strategies in learning disability: Relations between usage level, academic self-efficacy and self-concept. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131890
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An Exploration of The Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence. In Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 20, Issue 3).
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (seventh). Pearson Education, Inc.
Hanifah, Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Wardono. (2020). Mathematical Representation Ability and Self -Efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012062
Hedeshi, V. M. (2017). The Effect of Self-Regulatory Learning Strategies on Academic Engagement and Task Value. World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, 15(10), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.5742/mewfm.2017.93168
Jensen, M. (2015). Personality Traits, Learning and Academic Achievements. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n4p91
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL8: User’s Reference Guide. SSI, Inc.
Khilmi, N. (2018). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Dan Self Efficacy Siswa. In AlphaMath Journal of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, Issue 2). http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/alphamath/
King, L. A. (2014). The science of Psychology (3 rd). McGraw-Hill.
Köseoğlu, Y. (2015). Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN (Vol. 6, Issue 29). Online. www.iiste.org
Kudo, H., & Mori, K. (2015). A preliminary study of increasing self-efficacy in junior high school students: Induced success and a vicarious experience. Psychological Reports, 117(2), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.07.PR0.117c22z4
Lee, P. C., & Mao, Z. (2016). The relation among self-efficacy, learning approaches, and academic performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 16(3), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1136581
Lusiana, D., & Setyaningsih, E. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dengan Strategi Think Talk Write Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Dan Self Efficacy Siswa. In AlphaMath Journal of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, Issue 2).
Novita, D., Novita, S. &, & Djalal, M. (2018). The Effect of Self-Efficacy to Mathematical Anxiety on Junior High School Students of YDM Learning Guidance Course Makassar.
Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2015). Experience Human Development. McGraw-Hill.
Pasha-Zaidi, N., Afari, E., Sevi, B., Urganci, B., & Durham, J. (2019). Responsibility of learning: a cross-cultural examination of the relationship of grit, motivational belief and self-regulation among college students in the US, UAE and Turkey. Learning Environments Research, 22(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9268-y
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitaif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Sagone, E., & Caroli, M. E. de. (2013). Relationships between Resilience, Self-Efficacy, and Thinking Styles in Italian Middle Adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.763
Santrock, John. W. (2018). Educational psychology (6 th). McGraw-Hill.
Schunk, D. H. (n.d.). Self-E f ficacy and Academic Motivation. In Educational Psychologist (Vol. 26, Issue 4).
Strecher, V. J., Brenda McEvoy DeVellis, M., Becker, M. H., Irwin Rosenstock, M. M., Strecher is Assistant Professor, V. J., Becker is Professor, M. H., & Rosenstock is Professor, I. M. (n.d.). The Role of Self-Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Warner, L. M., & French, D. P. (2020). 32 Self-Efficacy Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1017/97811086773180.032
Warsihna, J., Ramdani, Z., & Felisima Tae, L. (2021). The Measurement of Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI): Sustaining Teacher’s Quality (Issue 3). www.psychologyandeducation.net
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
- Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).
License
AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).
You are free to :
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially