335
Abstract Views
253
PDF Download
Articles

Relationship of Mathematical Disposition with Student Problem Solving Construction Using Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Model

, ,
Pages [175-184]

Abstract

The construction of problem solving is important in the learning process of mathematics. The success of students in solving problems can also be supported by psychological aspects related to student attitudes in the learning process, such as interest and curiosity, self-confidence, open-mindedness, and others, all of which include into a mathematical disposition. Teachers should know the ability of students' mathematical dispositions to help teachers provide the right treatment for problems in constructing problem solving by applying the RME model. The research method used is a concurrent embedded strategy mix method. This research was conducted at SMP 3 Bae Kudus. The subjects of this research were students of class VIII SMP 3 Bae Kudus. The instrument used in this research is a mathematical disposition questionnaire, problem solving test results, and interviews. The results showed that there was a positive correlation between students' mathematical disposition abilities and students' problem solving construction using the RME model. The higher the student's mathematical disposition, the higher the problem-solving construction ability, supported by the application of RME.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Anggraini, D., Kusmayadi, T., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Construction of The Mathematical Concept of Pseudo Thinking Students. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012010

    Carlson, M. P., Madison, B., & West, R. D. (2015). Study of Students’ Readiness to Learn Calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 209–233.

    Dewi, N. P. W. P., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pendekatan PMRITerhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 4(2), 204–214.

    Feldhaus, C. A. (2014). How Pre Service Elementary School Teachers’ Mathematical Dispositions are Influenced by School Mathematics. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(6), 91–97.

    Genc, M., Camp, & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 222–237.

    Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. F., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical Reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(012057).

    Herna Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Mulyati, S. (2016). The Characterization of True Pseudo Construction In Understanding Concept Of Limit Function. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(5), 77–87.

    Lee, S. J. (2011). Mathematics Teachers’ Reasoning About Fraction and Decimal Using Drawn Representation. Math. Think. Learn, 13(3), 198–220.

    Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS Analysis of Natural Science Students’ Understanding of Derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–19.

    Masrurotullaily, Hobri, & Suharto. (2013). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Keuangan Berdasarkan Model Polya Siswa SMK Negeri 6 Jember. Kadikma, 4(2), 129–138.

    Muhtadi, D., Wahyudin, Kartasasmita, B. G., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). The integration of technology in teaching mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 012020.

    Mumu, J., & Prahmana, R. C. I. Tanujaya, B. (2017). Construction and Reconstruction Concept in Mathematics Instruction. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics.

    Murdiyani, N. M., Ilma, R., Putri, I., Eerde, D., & Van, F. (2013). Developing a Model to Support Students in Solving Subtraction. 4(1), 95–112.

    Nugroho, P. B., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., Sisworo, Hidayanto, E., & Susiswo. (2018). Critical Thinking Disposition: Students Skeptic in Dealing with Ill-Logical Mathematics Problem. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 635–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11343a

    Oftiana, S., & Saefudin, A. A. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Srandakan. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 293–301.

    Prafianti, R. A. (2019). Pengaruh Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Terhadap Disposisi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 1(1), 36–43.

    Prihartini, N., Sari, P., & Hadi, I. (2020). Design Research : Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Konsep Peluang Dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia Pada Siswa Kelas IX Di SMPN 220 Jakarta. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(8), 1–8.

    Rahayu, R., Kartono, & Sulhadi. (2014). The Effect Of Mathematical Disposition On Pmri Toward Problem Solving Abililt Based On Ideal Problem Solver. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(10), 1315–1318.

    Şahin, S. A., Tunca, N., Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2016). Relationship between Professional Values and Critical Thinking Disposition of Science-Technology and Mathematics Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), 25–40.

    Salmaniah, E., Yusmin, & Nursangaji, A. (2016). Disposisi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5(6), 1–3.

    Sandie, Purwanto, Subanji, & Hidayanto, E. (2019). Student difficulties in solving covariational problems. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 2(2), 42–47.

    Sari, D. P., & Mahendra. (2017). Developing Instrument to Measure Mathematical Reasoning Ability. In 1st International Conference of Mathematics and Science Education (ICMSEd 2016). Atlantis Press.

    Subanji. (2013). Proses Berpikir Pseudo Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Proporsi. J-Teqip, 4(2), 207–226.

    Subanji, & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking Process of Pseudo Construction in Mathematics Concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17–31.

    Sumirattana, Makanong, & Thipkong. (2017). Using realistic mathem atics education and the DAPIC problem -solving proce ss to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 307–315.

    Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Anggoro, Yudha, & Hayati. (2018). Ethnomathematics and Outdoor Learning to Improve Problem Solving Ability. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 295, 13–16.

    Widyastuti, N. S., & Pujiastuti, P. (2014). Pengaruh Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Dan Berpikir Logis Siswa. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(2), 183–193.

    Wu, W., & Adam, R. (2006). Modelling Mathematics Problem Solving Item Responses Using Multidimensional IRT Model. Math. Educ. Res. J, 18(2), 93–113.

    Yaniawati, R. P., Indrawan, R., & Setiawan, G. (2019). Core Model on Improving Mathematical Communication and Connection, Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Disposition. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 639–654.

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Fitria, K. N., Mastur, Z., & Suyitno, A. (2022). Relationship of Mathematical Disposition with Student Problem Solving Construction Using Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Model. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2), [175–184]. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i2.13612

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  • The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
  • The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
  • The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
  • Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

 

License

Creative Commons License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability

 

Indexed by







Collaborated

Statcounter

AlphaMath 

Template

Tools & Support