Abstract

Recent researches in teaching L reading comprehension has focused on cognitive and metacognative strategies that can increase students'comprehension and learning of English as a foreign language from written texts. However, the insights from these works have had limited impact on reading comprehension ability of EFL learners. The current ESL reading courses continue to rely on such standard activities as comprehension and skill-building exercises. Strategies training may receive little attention or be taught generically. This article urges English for general purposes (EGP) programs to devise more holistic strategy-oriented approaches for reading instructions. This study was therefore conducted a) to investigate the differences between the traditional
method and the critical thinking strategies of teaching reading comprehension passages to Iranian EFL students; b) to explore the differences between male and females' critical thinking abilities that have a crucial impact on their reading comprehension in Iran's EFL environments; c) to find out the differences between the Iranian EFL male and female students' critical thinking abilities in reading comprehension in two proficiency levels of low and high. To fulfill the purpose of the study, 2 male and female Iranian EFL students majoring in English
translation were selected from Islamic Azad universities, Ayatollah Amoli, Ghaemeshahr, and Sari branches. Then the subjects were screened into two proficiency levels based on the TOEFL tests. Each proficiency group was divided into critical and non-critical group. Each of the critical and non-critical group was divided into two male and female groups. Statistical analyses revealed that: 1) critical thinking strategies training affects EFL learners' reading comprehension performance. 2) the effect of critical thinking training does not vary across different language proficiency levels. 3) the effect of critical thinking training dose not vary for male and female students. The acquired conclusions indicate that substantial and fundamental changes are indispensable in language teaching and language environments, in general, and opening new doors to
critical thinking strategies of reading passages is taken for granted, in particular.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Anderson, R.C. and Pearson, P.D. (1984). A Schema-theoretic view of basic Process in Reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.255-293). New York: Longman
• Arons, A.B. (1979). Some thought on reasoning capacities implicitly expected of college students. In J. Lockhead and J. Clement (Eds), Cognitive process Instruction: Research on teaching thinking skills (pp. 209-215 . Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.
• Baker, L. (1985). Differences in the standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20,297-313.
• Brown, A.L. and Day, J.J. (). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise (Tech. Rep. No.270). Urbana: University of Illinois, center for the study of reading. Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, Thomson Learning, Inc.
• Fitzpatrick, K. (1993). Improving reading comprehension using critical thinking strategies. Reading Improvement, , 31, 142-144
• Friedman, M.I. and Rowls, M.D. (1980). Teaching reading and thinking skills. New York: Longman.
• Gallo, D. (1989). Educating for empathy, reason, and imagination. The Journal of creative behavior, 23 (2),98-115
• Hannel, G.I. and Hannel,L. (1998). The seven steps to critical thinking: A practical application of critical thinking skills. Available on line:
• Kataoka-Yahiro, M & Saylor, C. (1994) . A critical thinking model for nursing judgment. Journal of nursing Education, 33(8).351-356
• Mason, J.M. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of reading process as a basis for Comprehension instruction. In G.G. Duffy, L.R. Rochler and J. Mason (Eds), Comprehension instruction (pp. 26-38). New York: Longman.
• Parsis, S. (1987). Introduction to current issues in reading comprehension. Educational psychologist, 22,209-231.
• Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Stancato, F.A. (2000). Tenure, academic freedom and teaching of critical thinking. College student journal, 34(3).377.
• Stevick, E.W. (1996). Memory, meaning and method (second edition). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
• Walters, K.S. (1990). Critical thinking and Spock fallacy. Innovative Higher Education, 15(1)17-28.
• Waters, A. (2006). Thinking and language learning. ELT Journal, 60(4),319-237
• Wixson, K.K. and Peters, C.W. (1984). Reading redefined: A Michigan Reading Association position paper. Michigan Reading Journal, 17,4-7

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Copyright and permissions information is unavailable

Data Availability