1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 2 (2018)
  3. Widiyatmoko

Deskripsi Penalaran Analogi Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian David Keirsey Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Ajibarang

Sugeng Widiyatmoko

Abstract


This study aimed to describe students' analogical reasoning in SMP Negeri 1 Ajibarang viewed from personality types in the material of Three-Dimensional Shapes with Flat surfaces. Data subjects in this study were students of class VIII E and the sample was taken using purposive sampling technique. Students are grouped into three categories based on David Keirsey personality types namely rational, artisan, and guardian personality. Data were collected through tests, interviews, and documentation. To analyze the research data descriptive qualitative research method which included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion was used.  In addition, echnical triangulation test was employed as a validation test of the results.  The results indicated that, based on analogical reasoning ability, it was seen that rational students mastered all indicators of analogical reasoning ability, i.e. encoding, inferring, mapping, and applying. Students with artisan personality type mastered the encoding indicator only. And guardian students were able to master the encoding, inferring and applying indicator.

Keywords


reasoning; analogy; personality type; David Keirsey

References


Awilson. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian.Malang. UMM

English, L. D. (1999), Reasoning by analogy; pada Stiff, L.V. & Curcio, F.R. Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. Reston: NCTM.

English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning of Young Learners. New Jearsey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gardener,H (2006). Multiple Intellegences (Kecerdasan Majemuk: Teori dalam Praktik). Tangerang: Interaksa.

Hendirana, H dan Soemarmo, U. (2014). Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Keirsey, D. dan Bates, M. (1998). Please Understand Me II. California: Promotheus Nememis Book Company.

Keraf, G. (2010). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Khamidah, Khusnul. dan Suherman (2016). Proses berpikir matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika di tinjau dari tipe kepribadian keirsey. .Al- Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(2), 231-248.

Murdini. (2010). Logika. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: The National Teacher of Council of Mathematics inc.

Permendikbud no 58 lampiran 3 tahun 2014 tentang PMP Mmatematika SMP.

Riyani, R. (2014). Analisi Proses berpikir analogi dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal materi limas dan prisma pada siswa kelas VIII C SMP Islam Al-Azhar Tulungagung tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Skripsi Institute Agama Islam Tulungagung.

Shadiq, F. (2004). Penalaran dengan Analogi? Pengertiannya dan Mengapa Penting? dalam http;//p4tkmatematika.org/artikel/.

Sjarkawi. (2009). Pembentukan Kepribadian Anak. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Soekadijo, R.G. (1985). Logika Dasar: Tradisional, Simbolik dan Induktif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sudarma, M. (2013). Mengembangkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Surna, I Nyoman dan Pandeirot, O. D. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Metods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

UU No 22 tahun 2006 Standar Isi Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Wardhani, S. (2008). Paket Fasilitas Pemberdayaan KKG/MGMP Matematika.Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v4i2.7356

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2549-9084