1379
Abstract Views
1221
PDF Download
Cover and Table of Contents Issue

Deskripsi Penalaran Analogi Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian David Keirsey Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Ajibarang

Pages 9-14

Abstract

This study aimed to describe students' analogical reasoning in SMP Negeri 1 Ajibarang viewed from personality types in the material of Three-Dimensional Shapes with Flat surfaces. Data subjects in this study were students of class VIII E and the sample was taken using purposive sampling technique. Students are grouped into three categories based on David Keirsey personality types namely rational, artisan, and guardian personality. Data were collected through tests, interviews, and documentation. To analyze the research data descriptive qualitative research method which included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion was used.  In addition, echnical triangulation test was employed as a validation test of the results.  The results indicated that, based on analogical reasoning ability, it was seen that rational students mastered all indicators of analogical reasoning ability, i.e. encoding, inferring, mapping, and applying. Students with artisan personality type mastered the encoding indicator only. And guardian students were able to master the encoding, inferring and applying indicator.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Awilson. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian.Malang. UMM

    English, L. D. (1999), Reasoning by analogy; pada Stiff, L.V. & Curcio, F.R. Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. Reston: NCTM.

    English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning of Young Learners. New Jearsey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Gardener,H (2006). Multiple Intellegences (Kecerdasan Majemuk: Teori dalam Praktik). Tangerang: Interaksa.

    Hendirana, H dan Soemarmo, U. (2014). Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

    Keirsey, D. dan Bates, M. (1998). Please Understand Me II. California: Promotheus Nememis Book Company.

    Keraf, G. (2010). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

    Khamidah, Khusnul. dan Suherman (2016). Proses berpikir matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika di tinjau dari tipe kepribadian keirsey. .Al- Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(2), 231-248.

    Murdini. (2010). Logika. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

    NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: The National Teacher of Council of Mathematics inc.

    Permendikbud no 58 lampiran 3 tahun 2014 tentang PMP Mmatematika SMP.

    Riyani, R. (2014). Analisi Proses berpikir analogi dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal materi limas dan prisma pada siswa kelas VIII C SMP Islam Al-Azhar Tulungagung tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Skripsi Institute Agama Islam Tulungagung.

    Shadiq, F. (2004). Penalaran dengan Analogi? Pengertiannya dan Mengapa Penting? dalam http;//p4tkmatematika.org/artikel/.

    Sjarkawi. (2009). Pembentukan Kepribadian Anak. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

    Soekadijo, R.G. (1985). Logika Dasar: Tradisional, Simbolik dan Induktif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

    Sudarma, M. (2013). Mengembangkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

    Surna, I Nyoman dan Pandeirot, O. D. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

    Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Metods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

    UU No 22 tahun 2006 Standar Isi Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

    Wardhani, S. (2008). Paket Fasilitas Pemberdayaan KKG/MGMP Matematika.Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.
There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Widiyatmoko, S. (2020). Deskripsi Penalaran Analogi Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian David Keirsey Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Ajibarang. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v4i2.7356

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  • The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
  • The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
  • The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
  • Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

 

License

Creative Commons License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability

 

Indexed by





Statcounter

AlphaMath 

Template

Tools & Support