Abstract

Teaching English in Indonesia is still based on the 2013 curriculum. The government as the curriculum designers have not seen the potential use of CEFR as an English language learning curriculum. However, the CEFR has been used in several educational institutions even though it is not an official curriculum. This paper aimed to reveal the issues of the implementation of CEFR in Indonesia through literary studies. Several journal were involved as the sources of the data. The findings indicated that there were several issues in Indonesia that made CEFR could not be implemented in Indonesia. It required an adjustment to local needs that exist in Indonesia, and the material taught must also be able to adapt to Indonesian culture.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Arslan, Abdullah & Salih Özenici. 2017. A CEFR-based Curriculum Design for Tertiary Education Level. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 3
• Aziz, Abdul H. A. A., Radzuwan Ab Rashid, and Wan Zhafirah W. Z. 2018. The enactment of the Malaysian common European framework of reference (CEFR): National master trainer’s reflection. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 8 No. 2, Pp. 409-417.
• BéreÅ¡ová, Jana. 2017. The Impact of the CEFR on Teaching and Testing English in the Local Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 959-964
• Dewi, Rishe Purnama. 2016. Pengembangan Buku Ajar Pemula Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing Berbasis Cefr. Jurnal Tarbawy, Vol. 3 Nomor 2
• Foley, J.A. 2019. Adapting CEFR for English Language Education in ASEAN, Japan and China. Institute for English Language Education. Assumption University
• Hadijah, Sitti, Shalawati, Andi Idayani. 2018. Analisis Kemampuan Mahasiswa Dalam Berkomunikasi Secara Lisan Pada Tes Simulasi Ielts (International English Language Testing System). GERAM (Gerakan Aktif Menulis) Volume 6, Nomor 2
• Kusuma, Chusnu Syarifa Diah. 2018. Integrasi Bahasa Inggris Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Efisiensi – Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, Vol. XV No. 2Hal. 43- 50
• Purnomosasi, Lusia Kristiasih Dwi and Titis Agunging Tyas. 2014. Bahasa Inggris: Kurikulum 2013: Perbandingan Penerapan di SMP Kota Madiun. JURNAL LPPM V ol. 2 No.1. http://e- journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/JP- LPPM/article/download/345/317
• Solikhah, Imroatus. 2016. Pengembangan Model Kurikulum Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Berbasis KKNI. Konstruktivisme, 8(1): 20-36
• Sudaryanto, Sudaryanto and Pratomo Widodo. 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) dan Implikasinya bagi Buku Ajar BIPA. Jurnal Idiomatik Vol. 3, No. 2
• Won, M., & Kang, H. 2014. Foreign language proficiency and problems of implementation of CEFR in Korea. Yonsei University .

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Copyright and permissions information is unavailable

Data Availability