Abstract

This research is aimed to find out the presence of causality by analyzing students’ critical thinking ability in applying Carousel feedback learning model. This research employed quasi experimental research. The subject of the study was the fifth grade students of elementary1 and 4 Naira. There were 39 students. The instrument of the research was essay test that used to test the cognitive aspect with the purpose to measure the result of students’ conceptual mastery in their critical thinking ability. Besides test, there were two questionnaires that used in order to get information about students’ response toward the implementation of Carousel feedback learning k,model and the second questionnaire was used to analyze students’ self-efficacy. The result of critical thinking ability with nonparametric test and the Wilcoxon test showed that there was significance 0.000 < 0.05. Therefore, Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted. This means that there were differences in students' critical thinking skills before and after the implementation of Carousel Feedback learning model. Moreover, the result of students’ self-efficacy showed that the result of paired sample test was significance 0.016 < 0.05. Thus, it was decided that Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted. It can be said that there was difference about the ability of students’ self-efficacy before and after implementing Carousel feedback model in learning.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• [1] Ennis, Robert. 1991. “Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception.” Teaching Philosophy 14 (1): 5-24.

  [2] Fisher, Alec. 2011. Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Second Edition. Cambridge.

  [3] Kharbach, M. (2012). The 21’s Century Skills Teachers and Students Need to Have. Halifax: Creative Commons Attribution Mount Saint Vincent University.

  [4] Leicester, M., & Taylor, D. (2010). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum Developing Critical Thinking Skills, Literacy and Philosophy in The Primary Classroom. Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education McGraw-Hill House Shoppenhangers Road and Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2289, USA ISBN-13: 978-0-33-523879-8 (pb)

  [5] Fahim, M. & Barjesteh, H. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Study of Iranian EFL Reading Comprehension Performance. Islamic Azad University, Iran. Leksika Vol.5 No.2 – Aug 2011: 1-9

  [6] Rezaei, S., Derakhshan, A., & Bagherkazemi, M. (2011). Critical Thinking in Language Education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 769-777, © Academy Publisher Manufactured in Finland. ISSN 1798-4769 doi:10.4304/jltr.2.4.769-777

  [7] Friedrichsen, P. M. (2001). A Biology Course for Prospective Elementary Teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 63(8), 562-568. doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685.

  [8] Santrok, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th. New York: McGrawHill.

  [9] Nur, M., &Wikandari, P. R. (2008). Pengajaran Berpusat kepada Siswa dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan MatematikaSekolah (PSMS) Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

  [10] Mahananingtyas, E. 2013. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Carousel Feedback untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Efikasi Diri Siswa (Studi Pembelajaran IPS siswa kelas VI SDN Bandungrejosari 3Malang). Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

  [11] Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy:the exercise of control. New York: Free-man.

  [12] Ormrod, J. E. 2008. Educational psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

  [13] Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.

  [14] Budiyono, Fajar. 2018. Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Belajar Pemecahan Masalah Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Di SDN Gapura Timur I Sumenep. Premiere Educandum, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, Volume 8.

  [15] Widowati, A. 2009. Pengembangan Critical Thinking Melalui Penerapan Model PBL (Problem Based Learning) dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 16 Mei 2009. Diunduh dari http://eprints.uny.ac.id/12345/1/M_Bio_Asri%20Widowati%202.pdf pada tanggal 13 Maret 2020.

  [16] Schunk, D.H. 2012. Learning Theories An Educational Perspective. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

  [17] Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  [18] Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

  [19] Arikunto, S. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

  [20} Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educatioanl Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

  [21] Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  [22] Meltzer, D. E. (2002) The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Grains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variabel” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal Physic, Vol. 7 (12) 27 Halaman.

The Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability and Self-Effacement Toward Carousel Feedback Learning Model The Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability and Self-Effacement Toward Carousel Feedback Learning Model

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Data Availability