On Some Guiding Principles of Enacting Mathematical Problem Solving for Classroom Instruction
Abstract
In addressing the key role that problem solving has been playing in mathematics instruction for K12, this paper aims to assist mathematics teachers and educators to consider a set of guiding principles for designing problem solving tasks for classroom instructions. The set of guiding principles was synthesized and proposed through the researchers’ systematic review of existing education literature on problem solving.
Keywords
References
[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM): An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics in the 1980s. Reston, VA: NCTM. (1980).
[2] Department for Education: National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of study. GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationalcurriculuminenglandmathematicsprogrammesofstudy/nationalcurriculuminenglandmathematicsprogrammesofstudy. (2013, September 11).
[3] Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). Joint Statement On Proposed Maths Curriculum: Why Maths Must Change. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. Retrieved from https://aamt.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2020/07/earlymaths.pdf. (2021, March 31).
[4] Wilkerson, T.: Problem Solving: An Approach to Understanding and Critiquing Our World. National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/NewsandCalendar/MessagesfromthePresident/Archive/TrenaWilkerson/ProblemSolving_AnApproachtoUnderstandingandCritiquingOurWorld/. (2022, July).
[5] Ofsted: Research review series: mathematics. GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/researchreviewseriesmathematics/researchreviewseriesmathematics#curriculumsequencingconditionalknowledge.(2021, May 25).
[6] Ministry of Education (MOE): Education Statistics Digest 2021. Singapore: Ministry of Education, Research and Management Information Division, Management Information Branch. (2021).
[7] Fan, L. H., & Zhu, Y.: From convergence to divergence: the development of mathematical problem solving in research, curriculum, and classroom practice in Singapore. ZDM, 39(5), 491–501. (2007).
[8] Ministry of Education (MOE): Mathematics syllabus (Lower Secondary). Singapore: Curriculum Planning Division. (1990).
[9] Ministry of Education (MOE): Secondary mathematics syllabus. Singapore: Ministry of Education, Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2019).
[10] Kaur, B., & Yeap, B. H.: Mathematical Problem Solving in Singapore Schools. In B. Kaur, B. H. Yeap & M. Kapur (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 113). Singapore: World Scientific. (2009).
[11] Toh, T. L., Tay, E. G., Leong, Y. H., Quek, K. S., Ho, F. H., Dindyal, J., & Toh, P. C.: Mathematical Problem Solving for Everyone: Infusion and Diffusion. In Y. H. Leong, E. G. Tay, K. S. Quek, T. L. Toh, P. C. Toh, J. Dindyal, F. H. Ho, & R. A. S Yap. (Eds.), Making mathematics more practical: Implementation in the schools (pp. 121). Singapore: World Scientific. (2014).
[12] Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Leong, Y. H., Dindyal, J., & Tay, E. G.: Making mathematics practical: An approach to problem solving. Singapore: World Scientific. (2011).
[13] Leong, Y. H., Lu, P. C., Toh, W. Y, K.: Use of Challenging Items in Instructional Materials by Singapore Secondary School Mathematics Teachers. In B. Kaur & Y. H. Leong (Eds.), Mathematics Instructional Practices in Singapore Secondary Schools (pp. 231 – 248). Springer. (2021).
[14] Leong, Y. H., Toh, T. L., Tay, E. G., Toh, P. C., Quek, K. S., Dindyal, J., & Ho, F. H.: Another Step towards Mathematical Problem Solving for Everyone. In Y. H. Leong, E. G. Tay, K. S. Quek, T. L. Toh, P. C. Toh, J. Dindyal, F. H. Ho, & R. A. S Yap. (Eds.), Making mathematics more practical: Implementation in the schools (pp. 107114). Singapore: World Scientific. (2014).
[15] Leong, Y. H., Tay, E. G., Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Toh, P. C., & Dindyal, J.: Infusing Mathematical Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum: Replacement Units. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems: Advances and New Perspectives (pp. 309325). Springer. (2016).
[16] Leong, Y. H.: Problems of teaching in a Singapore reformoriented mathematics classroom. Lambert Academic Publishing. (2009).
[17] Mason, J., & JohnstonWilder, S.: Designing and using mathematical tasks. United Kingdom: Tarquin Publications. (2006).
[18] Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M.: Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. (1996).
[19] Polya, G.: How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (1945).
[20] Lester, F. K.: Trends and issues in mathematical problemsolving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 229261). Orlando, Fl: Academic Press. (1983).
[21] Schoenfeld, A.: Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum : A report, recommendations, and an annotated bibliography. Mathematical Association of America, Committee on the Teaching of Undergraduate Mathematics. (1983).
[22] Schoenfeld, A.: Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, Fl: Academic Press. (1985).
[23] Schroeder, T., & Lester, F.: Developing understanding in mathematics via problem solving. In P. Traffon & A. Shulte (Eds.), New directions for elementary school mathematics: 1989 yearbook (pp. 3142). Reston, VA: NCTM. (1989).
[24] Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & BayWilliams, J. M.: Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (10th ed.). Pearson. (2019).
[25] Lester, F. K., & Charles, R. Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving: PreK–Grade 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2003).
[26] Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. W.: Designing Effective Mathematics Instruction: A Direct Instruction Approach (4th ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. (2006).
[27] Yoong, W. K.: Effective mathematics lessons through an eclectic Singapore approach. Singapore: World Scientific. (2015).
[28] Butt, G.: Lesson planning (3rd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group. (2008).
[29] Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.).: A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (complete ed.). Longman. (2001).
[30] Houff, S.: Instructional alignment: Optimizing objectives, methods, and assessment for developing unit plans. Rowman & Littlefield. (2012).
[31] Piaget, J.: The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.) New York: Norton. (1952).
[32] Matlin, M. W.: Cognitive psychology (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. (2014).
[33] Tan, O. S., Chye, Y. L. S., Lim, K. J., Chua, B. L., Tuckman, B. W., & Monetti, D. M.: Educational psychology: An asia edition. Cengage Learning Asia Ltd. (2017).
[34] Vygotsky, L. S.: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. JohnSteiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (1978).
[35] Hino, K.: Developing Interaction Toward the Goal of the Lesson in a Primary Mathematics Classroom. In Toh, P. C., & Chua, B. L. (Eds.), Mathematics instruction: Goals, tasks and activities (pp. 133158). Singapore: World Scientific. (2018).
[36] Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.: Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371406. (2005).
[37] De Lange, J.: Largescale assessment and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1111 – 1142). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. (2007).
[38] Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H.: Classroom assessment and educational measurement. Routledge. (2020).
[39] Depka, E. M.: Designing assessment for mathematics. SAGE Publications. (2007).
[40] Yeo, J. B. W.: Development of a Framework to Characterise the Openness of Mathematical Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 175–191. (2015).
[41] Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive Load Theory. Springer. (2011).
[42] Gilmore, C., Göbel, S. M., & Inglis, M.: An introduction to mathematical cognition. Routledge. (2018).
[43] Chamberlin, S. A.: The Construct of Affect in Mathematical Modeling. In Chamberlin, S. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Affect in mathematical modeling. Springer. (2019).
[44] Chamberlin, S. A., & Parks, K.: A comparison of student affect after engaging in a mathematical modeling activity. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8(3), 177189. (2020).
[45] Tomlinson, C. A.: The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2014).
[46] Tomlinson, C. A.: How to differentiate instruction in mixedability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2001).
[47] Anthony, G., & Hunter, R.: Developing Student Voice in the Mathematics Classroom. In B. Kaur & N. H. Lee (Eds.), Empowering Mathematics Learners (pp. 99115). Singapore: World Scientific. (2017).
[48] Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., & Lee, C. K. E.: The Singapore Curriculum: Convergence, Divergence, Issues and Challenges. In Z. Deng, S. Gopinathan, & C. K. E. Lee (Eds.), Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum : From Policy to Classroom (pp. 263275). Springer. (2013).
[49] Kaur, B., Tay, E. G., Tong, C. L., Toh, T. L., & Quek, K. S.: The Instructional Core That Drives the Enactment of the School Mathematics Curriculum in Singapore Secondary Schools. In B. Kaur & Y. H. Leong (Eds.), Mathematics Instructional Practices in Singapore Secondary Schools (pp. 4559). Singapore: World Scientific. (2021).
DOI: 10.30595/dinamika.v16i1.20441
Copyright (c) 2024 Yu Xin Ng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN: 2655870X

Visitors