Contribution of Basic Education to Earth Governance Systems and Future Social Sciences

Authors

  • Khairunnas Khairunnas Universitas Riau
  • Mahmud Alpusari Universitas Riau
  • Victor Amrifo Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v13i1.7617

Keywords:

Problem based learning based on scaffolding, mathematical modeling, elementary school, earth's governance system, social science

Abstract

Scientific literacy has become a fundamental focus of Education and is related to the ability to criticize scientific discussions. From the beginning we are required to be able to make decisions by individuals and have a sense of responsiveness to public issues related to science but do not rule out access to get it all must be good both in terms of learning in elementary school. Learning is divided into two, namely conventional and problem-based learning based on scaffolding. The result of this article is the need to increase mathematical modeling skills in students with a problem-based learning approach is higher than conventional. So, Problem based learning will certainly have a positive effect to tackle global warming by applying five main challenges and correlating the relationship of the earth's governance system to social science with elementary education input as the spearhead of generational change for the better.

References

[1] Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41,75-86.

[2] Lee, H. Y. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 2079-2113.

[3] Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H. M., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In H. M. Doerr & R. Lesh (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A models & modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning & teaching (pp. 35–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[4] Hodson, D. (2013). Time for Action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.

[5] Yarden, A. (2009). Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy. Research Science Education, 307-311.

[6] Mousoulides, N.; Pittalis, M. & Christou, C. (2006). Improving Mathematical Knowledge Through Modeling in Elementary Schools.

[7] Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Veira, C. (2014). Fostering Scientific Literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of science and mathematics education.

[8] Mousoulides, N.G. (2009). Mathematical Modeling for Elementary and Secondary School Teachers.

[9] Biermann, F., (2007). Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17, 326–337.

[10] Biermann, F., (2010). Earth system governance: a research framework. Int Environ Agreements, 10:277–298.

[11] Biermann, F., (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4:51–60.

[12] Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R., (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27.

[13] Biermann, F., (2019). The Earth System Governance Project as a network organization: a critical assessment after ten years. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39:17–23.

[14] Alpusari, M., Hermita, N., Amrifo, V., & Wijaya, T,T., (2020). Elementary Education as a Bridge to Change the Earth’s Governance System for the Future. DINAMIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 2020, 12 (2), ISSN: 2655-870X (online), https://doi.org/10.30595/Dinamika/v12i2.7537

[15] Umanailo, B, C, M., Hamid, I., Hamiru, H., Bula, M., Assagaf, F, S., Yusuf, S., Pulhehe, S., Nawawi, M., 2019. Utilization of Qualitative Methods in Research Universities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Pilsen, Czech Republic, July 23-26.

[16] Creswell, John W., 2014. “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

[17] Sarkar, M. &. (2014). Bangdeshi science teachers' perspectives of scientific literacy and teaching practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1117-1141.

[18] National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

[19] Kampourakis, K. (2019). Science, Society and Scientific Literacy. Science and Education.

[20] Development, O. f.-o. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework-key competencies in reading, mathemathics and science. Paris, France: Author.

[21] Papageorgiou, G. (2009). The Effect og Mathematical modeling on student’ affect. Thesis. AMSTEL Institute Universiteit Vans Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[22] DeBoer, G. E. (2017). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (37), 582-601.

[23] Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purpose to practice. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

[24] Pitriani, P. (2006). Ability to Model Mathematics in Realistic Mathematics Education (RME), Jurnal Edukasi & Sains Matematika. 2, 76.

[25] Randall I. C. & Carmel, CA. (2005) Big Ideas and Understandings as the Foundation for Elementary and Middle School Mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 7(3), 9-23.

[26] Riyanto, Y. (2009). New Learning Paradigm. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

[27] Schifter, D., Russell, S.J., & Bastable, V. (1999) Teaching to the Big Ideas. In The Diagnostic Teacher: Constructing New Approaches to Professional Development, edited by Mildred Z. Solomon. New York, New York: Teachers College Press. 22-47.

[28] Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Dochy, F. (2006). The authoritative teaching style: a model for the study of teaching styles. Pedagogische Studien, 83, 419-431.

[29] Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42, 115-121.

[30] Verschaffel, L. (2002). Taking the modelling perspective seriously at the elementary school level: promises and pitfalls. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of 26th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 64–80. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

[31] Nafiah, Y. N. (2014). Application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Student Learning Outcomes”.

[32] Maskur, M., 2016. PBL Model with Schoology Assisted Scaffolding to Improve Problem Solving Capability and Independent Character. National Mathematics X Semarang State University.

[33] Setiawan, D. 2014. The Effectiveness of PBL Based on Character Values Assisted by the Learning CD Against the Problem Solving Capabilities of Class VII Material Squares. Journal of Mathematics Education.UJME 3 (1).

Downloads

Published

2021-04-01

How to Cite

Khairunnas, K., Alpusari, M., & Amrifo, V. (2021). Contribution of Basic Education to Earth Governance Systems and Future Social Sciences. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 13(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v13i1.7617

Issue

Section

Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.