The Effect of Elementary Education on the Relationship of Social Science to the Earth's Governance System

Authors

  • Mahmud Alpusari Universitas Riau
  • Neni Hermita Universitas Riau
  • Victor Amrifo Universitas Riau
  • Tommy Tanu Wijaya Guangxi Normal University, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v12i2.7537

Keywords:

Sustainability, earth system governance, social science, elementary education, five research

Abstract

The sustainability of this research from Biermann has a focus on collaborating on the earth system governance network based on five research challenges namely architecture, agency, adaptability, allocation, and accountability. Research in order to link the relationship of social science with the earth's governance system. It turns out that the social system is very influential in the earth's governance system, so the need to instill the value of the value of love of nature since elementary education so that the impact of the social system on the earth's governance system in the future can be minimized. The results of this study indicate that social systems consisting of people, governments, and non-government actors must work together to deal with the impact of a dynamic earth governance system. For this reason, elementary education is needed to reduce the negative impact of changes in the earth's governance system through the cultivation of character education that loves the environment while having a sense of responsibility.

Author Biographies

Mahmud Alpusari, Universitas Riau

PGSD, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia

Program Studi Doktoral Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia

Neni Hermita, Universitas Riau

PGSD, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia

Victor Amrifo, Universitas Riau

PGSD, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia

Program Studi Doktoral Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia

Tommy Tanu Wijaya, Guangxi Normal University, China

3Department Mathematics and Statistics, Guangxi Normal University, China

References

A.S. Lee, R.L. Baskerville, Generalizing generalizability in information systems research, Information Systems Research 14 (2003) 221–243.

Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163– 173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211

Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Diduck AP, Doubleday NC, Johnson DS, Marschke M, McConney

Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S., Zurek, M., & Pingali, P. L. (2003). Why global scenarios need ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 322–329.

Berkes FJ, Colding J, Folke C. 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Berkes, F., Folke, C., 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Biermann,F., 2014. Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Biermann, et al., 2010. Earth system governance: a research framework. Int Environ Agreements (2010) 10:277–298.

Biermann, et al., 2012. Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4:51–60.

Biermann, et al., 2017. Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2017, 26–27.

Biermann, et al., 2019. The Earth System Governance Project as a network organization: a critical assessment after ten years. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2019, 39:17–23.

Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–294.

Biermann, F., 2007. Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17 (2007) 326–337.

Brandis, et al., 2014. Towards a framework for governance architecture management in cloud environments: A semantic perspective. Future Generation Computer Systems 32 (2014) 274–281.

Bunnell, T., Miller, M. A., Phelps, N. A., & Taylor, J. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories? Pacific Affairs, 86, 857–876.

Chaffin,C,B dan Gunderson,H,L.,2016. Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: Rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 165 (2016) 81e87

Chan,S dan Pattberg,P.,2008. Private Rule-Making and the Politics of Accountability: Analyzing Global Forest Governance. Global Environmental Politics 8:3, August 2008

Clapp, Jennifer. 2002. What the Pollution Havens Debate Overlooks. Global Environmental Politics 2 (2): 11-19.

Clapp,J., 2005. Global Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and Accountability. Global Environmental Politics 5:3, August 2005

COAFFEE, J. and HEALEY, P. (2003) ‘My voice: my place’: tracking transformations in urban governance, Urban Studies, 40(10), pp. 1979–1999.

Dellas, et al., 2011. Agency in earth system governance: refining a research agenda. Int Environ Agreements (2011) 11:85–98

den Elzen, M. G. J., Ho¨hne, N., Brouns, B., Winkler, H., & Ott, H. E. (2007). Differentiation of countries’ post-2012 mitigation commitments under the South-North Dialogue Proposal. Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 185–203.

Djalante,R.,2012. Adaptive governance and resilience: the role of multi-stakeholder platforms in disaster risk reduction. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2923–2942, 2012

DOCHERTY, I., GOODLAD, R. and PADDISON, R.(2001) Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods,Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2225–2250

Düwell, M., Bos, G., & van Steenbergen, N. (Eds.). (2018). Towards the ethics of a green future. London: Routledge.

Falaleeva, et al., 2011. Towards climate adaptation and coastal governance inIreland: Integrated architecture for effective management?. Marine Policy35(2011)784–793.

Fraser, N., Hanne Marlene, D., Pauline, S., & Rasmus, W. (2004). Recognition, redistribution and representation in Capitalist Global Society: An interview with Nancy Fraser. Acta Sociologica, 47(4), 374–382.

Gallopin, G., Hammond, A., Raskin, P., & Swart, R. (1997). Branch points: Global scenarios and human choice. Global Scenarios Group. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.

Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds.), 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds.), 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Gupta,J dan Lebel,J., 2010. Access and allocation in earth system governance: water and climate change compared. Int Environ Agreements (2010) 10:377–395.

Habtezion, et al., 2015. Earth System Governance in Africa: knowledge and capacity needs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2015, 14:198–205.

Jayawardana,A,B,H., 2016. character education care for the environment early on as an effort to mitigate ecological disasters. Prosiding Symbion.

Jedd,C dan Bixler,P,R., 2015. Accountability in Networked Governance: Learning from a case of landscape-scale forest conservation. Environmental Policy and Governance Env. Pol. Gov. (2015)

Kalfagianni, A., Gerlak, A., Olsson, L., & Scobie, M. (2019). Justice. In A. Kalfagianni, D. Fuchs, & A. Hayden (Eds.), Handbook of global sustainability governance. London: Routledge.

Kalfagianni1 ,A., and Meisch,S., 2020. Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10‑year review of the literature. Int Environ Agreements

Kanie, et al., 2010. Allocation and architecture in climate governance beyond Kyoto: lessons from interdisciplinary research on target setting. Int Environ Agreements (2010) 10:299–315

Lebel, et al., 2005. Sub-global scenarios. In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ed.), Ecosystems and human well-being Multiscale assessment. Findings of the sub-global assessments working group. New York: Island Press.

Levy, David, and Peter Newell. 2002. Business Strategy and International Environmental Governance: Toward a Neo-Gramscian Synthesis. Global Environmental Politics 2 (4): 84-101.

Manning, S., and Reinecke, J., 2016. A modular governance architecture in-the-making:How transnational standard-setters govern sustainability transitions. Research Policy 45 (2016) 618–633.

Mitchell,R,B., 2013. Oran Young and international institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 13(1): 1–14.

Modi, V., McDade, S., Lallement, D., & Saghir, J. (2005). Energy services for the millennium development goals. New York: Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme, United Nations Development Programme, UN Millennium Project, and World Bank.

Neumayer, E., 2001. Greening Trade and Investment: Environmental Protection Without Protectionism. London: Earthscan.

Novalia, et al., 2020. Transformative agency in co-producing sustainable development in the urban south. Cities 102 (2020) 102747.

Ostrom, E., 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socialecological systems. Science 325, 419e422.

P, Pinkerton, Wollenberg EK. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(2): 95–102.

Raco, M. (2000) Assessing community partici?pation in local economic development: lessons for new urban policy, Political Geography, 19(5), pp. 573–599.

Robeyns, I. (2019). What if anything is wrong with extreme wealth? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(3), 251–266.

Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J.A., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (7263), 472e475

Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Stuart Chapin, F., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475 (24 Sept 2009).

Root, H,L., 2005. Capital and Collusion. The Politics of Risk and Uncertainty in Economic Development. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Sklair, Leslie. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.

Steffen, W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., Crumley, C., Crutzen, P., Folke, C., Gordon, L., Molina, M., Ramanathan, V., Rockstrom, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H.J., Svedin, U., 2011. The anthro- € pocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40 (7), 739e761.

Swyngedouw, E., 2005. Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Stud 2005 42: 1991.

UN Energy.,2005. The energy challenge for achieving the millennium development goals, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 31 I.L.M. 1992, 822.

UN-Habitat.,2018. Press release: UN-habitat scroll of honour winners

Werners, at al.,2009. Exploring earth system governance: A case study of floodplain management along the Tisza river in Hungary.Global Environmental Change 19 (2009) 503–511

Downloads

Published

2021-03-06

How to Cite

Alpusari, M., Hermita, N., Amrifo, V., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). The Effect of Elementary Education on the Relationship of Social Science to the Earth’s Governance System. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v12i2.7537

Issue

Section

Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

Most read articles by the same author(s)